Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, with a general score of 86.6 against 83.1. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a somewhat thicker and a little heavier phone than OPPO Find X2 Pro. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a higher display density.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has just a little bit longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.