Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is slightly better than the Galaxy A25 5G, having an 86.6 score against 79.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the older 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Although Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a better cellphone than the Galaxy A25 5G, it must be told that it is also a way older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has faster video frame rates, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4720mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.