Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, having a general score of 86.6 against 86.6. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a extremely thinner and a lot lighter device than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, although they were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A50s and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 feature quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50s has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has better video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has an 18% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.