Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3, with a 90.7 score against 86.6. Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 and Samsung Galaxy A52 count with similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A52 has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a same size sensor, the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.