Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3's global score of 86.6. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple additional features. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a display that is very similar to the screen in Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per screen inch.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a 64 megapixels back facing camera, the same back camera sensor size, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy A52s has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52s also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 4720mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.