Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3, with a general score of 88.1 against 86.6. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10, offering a couple additional features. The Galaxy F62 is a newer device, and it's also a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 3.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3. Both have a better pixel amount per inch in the screen, a screen of the same size and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy F62 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Galaxy F62 has a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4720mAh. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same sensor size, a back facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution, the same video definition and the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.