Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3's overall score of 86.6. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer and thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit superior processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a better amount of pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a much larger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features as much memory capacity for apps and games as the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 one, both have the same internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 6% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.