Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | -- |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | -- |
| 7.83 ounces | -- |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, with a 90.7 score against 86.6. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is extremely thinner and notably lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 3.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a better display pixel density, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy S25 Ultra has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has more internal memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4720mAh.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations, a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back camera with a way higher 200 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.