Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 global score. Although Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a better phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it must be noted that it's also older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. They have a camera with a 64 MP resolution and a same size aperture. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 6 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.