Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-06 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, having a score of 90.7 against 88.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, although they were only released 2 months apart. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with a bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 and the Galaxy A52 count with really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.