Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 4's 88.3 score. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a just a little bit lighter and thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, even though both were released only a few months apart.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite worse display density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy A52s features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s's battery life is just as good as the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.