Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-05-06 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mirror Black and Pale Grey | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 4's 88.3 overall score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Z Flip is older than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little lower count of pixels per screen inch and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, they both have a display of the same size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Black Shark 4. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Black Shark 4, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.