Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is better than the Xiaomi Black Shark's 80.4 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is extremely heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark, it's a lot thinner and also a lot newer.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.