Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Alpine white and Solstice grey | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.86 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a general score of 93.1, which is better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 overall score. Although the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is a better device than the Galaxy A25 5G, we must tell that it is also older, a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features an extremely better processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each inch in the screen and a little more brightness.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a camera with way more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments and a much larger sensor. Galaxy A25 5G has a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.