Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note7's global score of 79.5. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's construction is much newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy Note7. Galaxy Note7 has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy Note7 features a superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has more RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.