Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-13 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, with an 81.9 score against 81.2. Although the Galaxy S8 Active is extremely older and somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, it's body is still a little bit lighter. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite and Galaxy S8 Active count with really similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy S8 Active has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Galaxy S8 Active has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S8 Active also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.