Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4250mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, having a overall score of 87.1 against 85. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is much newer than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite's, although it is way thicker and somewhat heavier.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 lesser processing cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bit bigger display and a lot brighter display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a 6% greater battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 50 mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.