Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4250mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a global score of 85, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite construction is newer, incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher number of pixels per screen inch. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.