Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-29 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a global score of 90.7 against 81.9. Even being the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra body is extremely older, noticeably heavier and a little thicker than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has a little worse 1256 x 2760 resolution, a quite smaller screen and a just a little worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a lot brighter display.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, they have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with improved battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4310mAh.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor which provides a lot worse image and video quality and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a back facing camera with a 50 megapixels, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.