Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-29 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | -- |
| Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, getting a 90.7 score against 79.4. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Although it's the best we compare here, Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's body is way older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a lot brighter screen, a quite bigger display, a better amount of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing worse quality photos and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy A35 5G has a battery lifetime that is just as good as Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.