Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 8.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy F62's general score of 88.1. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra construction is thinner but just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy F62, and both were released with only 1 months difference.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a more vivid display than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, much more brightness, more pixels per inch of screen and a little larger screen. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy F62, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy F62 counts with a better memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.