Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-29 | -- |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 8.25 ounces | -- |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | -- |
| Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a little bit better than Galaxy S25 Ultra, having a 90.7 score against 90.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has 11 version and Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density and a little bit lower 1440 x 3088px resolution, and they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also counts with a way brighter screen.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra and Galaxy S25 Ultra both count with similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have the same internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has better video frame rates, a back camera with much more MP, a way bigger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.