Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-29 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a 90.7 score against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra construction is notably newer and thinner, but also incredibly heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel number in each inch of display, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a way larger display and way more display brightness.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has better battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent more battery size. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.