Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Black |
| Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 516 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a newer device, and it is also a little lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a better looking display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a much bigger screen and a little higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, a camera with lot more MP and a much higher video quality.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.