Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 8.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, having a global score of 94.6 against 90.7. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS, so both should offer the same operating system features. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is thinner but also somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra and the Galaxy Z Fold 2 have extremely similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.