Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Blue |
| Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting a general score of 90.7 against 80.2. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra construction is newer, but notably heavier and just a little thicker than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has newer 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher resolution and a much better video definition.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.