Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.09 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, with a 78.3 score against 78.1. Vivo X70 Pro's body has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, but it is just a little bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but vivo X70 Pro has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster). The Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus features a bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a bit worse pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a larger aperture.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.