Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 5s, with an 81.6 score against 76.4. The Google Pixel 2 is a newer device, and it's also a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 5s. The Google Pixel 2 features a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 2 also has a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi 5s has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 5s also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Google Pixel 2 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures in low light environments and a better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Google Pixel 2's storage for apps and games is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi 5s one, both have equal 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 19 percent more battery size.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.