Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 345.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, getting an 84.7 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A32 is much newer than Xiaomi Mi 5s, it's thicker and incredibly heavier.
The Galaxy A32 features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1080 x 1920px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.