Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 345.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, with a overall score of 77.8 against 76.4. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a noticeably newer and noticeably thinner device than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, but it's also noticeably heavier. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a way bigger screen, a lot brighter screen and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM and 4 less cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 78 percent bigger battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a way better resolution camera, a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and a lot higher video resolution.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi 5s. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Mi 5s, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.