Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, with a general score of 78.8 against 76.4. Even though the vivo X60 Pro is somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5s, it's just a bit thinner and also noticeably newer. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X60 Pro has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a little sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per display inch. Vivo X60 Pro has a much greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has more internal storage.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores. The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.