Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 430 pixels per inch | -- |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a global score of 81.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s score of 79.2. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much lower brightness and a quite smaller screen.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a much greater processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with more megapixels. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 53% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.