Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a score of 81.4, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is extremely older than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is much lighter and thinner. These phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a little lower screen density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much brighter screen and a quite bigger screen.
Galaxy A25 5G features a superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a much powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 63% more battery size. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.