Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, with a score of 88.1 against 81.4. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy F62's body is newer, but a lot thicker and notably heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little bit better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more brightness and a little bit better display pixel density. Galaxy F62 features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has 4 more cores. Galaxy F62 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same video quality, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 128% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.