Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's general score of 81.4. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, although it's a little thicker and extremely heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a screen that is very similar to Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's screen, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a little bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bigger screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot larger back camera sensor, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.