Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-15 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, with a 90.7 score against 81.4. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is a lot thinner and much lighter than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, way more brightness and a quite larger display. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a much higher video definition, a lot larger camera sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way more megapixels camera in the back. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.