Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's overall score of 81.4. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, it's a little bit thinner and also newer.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 47 percent greater battery size. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.