Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-06 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Purple | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a global score of 83.2 against 79.9. Xiaomi Mi 9's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with much more brightness and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi 9 has a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Xiaomi Mi 9 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with less MP, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also counts with a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.