Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-06 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Purple | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9's global score of 83.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy F62 is newer than the Xiaomi Mi 9, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also has a greater number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi 9 has a slightly better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a brighter display. Galaxy F62 has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9 captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F62, although it has a camera with a much lower 48 MP resolution, a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality photos and videos and a lower video resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. The Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.