Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-06 | -- |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.10 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Purple | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 has a score of 83.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S25's global score of 82.6. Xiaomi Mi 9 has a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch and much more brightness.
Xiaomi Mi 9 and Samsung Galaxy S25 both have extremely similar memory capacity to install applications and games, they have equal internal storage. The Galaxy S25 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better video resolution and a higher resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.