Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-07-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi A3's global score of 79.2. Galaxy A25 5G's construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Mi A3, but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11 version, giving some extra features.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a better count of pixels per display inch, a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A25 5G has more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 24% larger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi A3 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a worse (4K) video quality, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.