Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-07-24 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, with a score of 88.1 against 79.2. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is newer than the Xiaomi Mi A3's, but it's extremely heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with more RAM. Galaxy F62 features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a greater pixels quantity per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a way higher resolution camera and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy F62 has a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.