Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Xiaomi Mi A3, with a overall score of 94.6 against 79.2. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also a lot heavier than the Xiaomi Mi A3. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a larger screen, a much higher 1768 x 2208px resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Mi A3 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor which offers a lot lower photo and video quality and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.