Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2017-10-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 614.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, having a score of 81.2 against 80. Even though Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is older and much heavier than Google Pixel 3, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. Google Pixel 3 features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2160px, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a bit better number of pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos and a camera with more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 17% more battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, else you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.