Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-03 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 639.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 overall score. Even being the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s construction is notably older, a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than the vivo X70 Pro. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro features a screen that's very similar to the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s one, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a bit inferior pixels amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels. Vivo X70 Pro features a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
The vivo X70 Pro's memory to install applications and games is just as good as Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's one, they have equal internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.