Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Titanium | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, with a general score of 91.1 against 88.9. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10 version, providing you a couple additional features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy A52s is a newer phone, and it is also thinner and notably lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a better 2088 x 2250 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a much smaller sensor taking much worse quality pictures and videos, a lower 3840x2160 video quality, a back-facing camera with way less megapixels and a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.