Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-09-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, with a 93.4 score against 88.9. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10, giving you lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is way newer, lighter and incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels, a tinier camera aperture and a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a much better video definition.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.