Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-07-19 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2488 x 2224 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 417 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, having a global score of 85.3 against 84.3. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a noticeably older, way heavier and somewhat thicker device than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a more vivid screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 2224 x 2488 pixels resolution, a quite better pixels number in each inch in the screen and much more display brightness. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a superior storage to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a very superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes much better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a lot higher video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit longer battery life than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 4449mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.