Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-09 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with an 80.6 score against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite design is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit opaque display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixels count per display inch. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Galaxy S7 Active has a better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 200 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.