Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's global score of 80.6. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, it's noticeably thinner and also newer. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.